|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.04.26 - 20:06
|
Thousands call on UK ministers to cut ties with US tech giant Palantir (The Guardian)
|
|
|
More than 200,000 have signed petitions urging the government to break contracts, amid concerns about the company's 'supervillain' manifestoOver 200,000 people have called on ministers to break contracts with Palantir in an apparent groundswell of public concern about the US tech company's role in the NHS, police, military and councils.Two petitions have attracted 229,000 signatures, one calling for the government to end all public contracts with the firm, whose software is used by Donald Trump's ICE immigration enforcement programme and the Israeli military, and another urging the health secretary, Wes Streeting, to cancel its £330 patient data contract with the NHS. Continue reading......
|
|
|
23.04.26 - 20:03
|
Big Tech zum Schnäppchenpreis? (Der Aktionaer)
|
|
|
Für Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon und Meta steht in der kommenden Woche die nächste Bewährungsprobe an. Das Analystenhaus Barclays beflügelt vorab die Stimmung: Die Ausgangslage ist hervorragend – für die Unternehmen selbst, aber auch für die Aktionäre....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.04.26 - 19:54
|
BP′s chair deserved a kick for his silly obstinacy over shareholder resolution (The Guardian)
|
|
|
Albert Manifold and his board refused to put a request from investor group on annual meeting agenda – leading to an investor revoltBP has fresh faces in the boardroom and a rigged strategy: it's pivoting back to oil and gas and away from its low-carbon assets in an attempt to improve a weak share price. One can agree or disagree with the approach. But it was a silly act of overreach for a newish chair to try to stifle debate on such matters.That, in effect, was what Albert Manifold did when he excluded a resolution for Thursday's annual meeting from Follow This, a Dutch investor group. The proposal itself cannot be described as explosive. It was pitched in investor-friendly terms and would merely have obliged BP to describe how it would protect shareholder value if demand for oil and gas falls. Nor is Follow This some two-bob outfit within the ranks of climate groups. It was claiming support from investors with $1tn under management. Continue reading......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|