|
|
|
|
|
24.01.26 - 17:00
|
Again C3.AI - 90 % potential profit - TARGET 24 USD (TradingView)
|
|
|
On the daily chart, the stock remains in a long-term downtrend; however, downward momentum has clearly weakened in recent weeks. Price has stabilized around the 12–13 USD area, which previously acted as a demand zone. This price behavior suggests a possible accumulation phase following a prolonged decline.
Volatility has compressed significantly near the lows, a condition that often precedes a strong directional move. The price has also started to interact more closely with shorter-term moving averages, indicating an improvement in short-term market structure. A potential rebound toward 24 USD aligns with a major former supply zone and the area of the long-term moving average, making it a logical upside technical target.
As long as price holds above the current support zone and buying volume increases, a short-term bullish recovery toward higher levels remains a valid scenario.
Potential TP: 24 $
This analysis is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08.12.25 - 18:57
|
I Found a Pattern in $AI That Shouldn't Exist. 45–46 (late 2026) (TradingView)
|
|
|
I've been studying NYSE:AI 's entire 2025 price cycle, and what I found is pretty interesting.
The entire downtrend wasn't random, it behaved like a damped harmonic oscillator.
First drop: –28
Second drop: –15
Third drop: –7
Each decline was almost exactly 50% of the previous one.
Same thing on the rallies:
First up-leg: +13
Second: +5.4
That's a 40% decay ratio.
Time cycles also shrank consistently:
105 days → 32 days → projected 10 days
Classic volatility compression.
So mathematically, the trend was dying.
The system was running out of downward energy
And then it broke the model.
The latest leg up exceeded the expected top
meaning the damping phase is over.
So I mirrored the entire pattern. Literally flipped it upside down
If the downtrend behaved like a decaying oscillator, the reversal should behave like an expanding oscillator.
The geometry lines up.
The timings line up.
The volume shelves line up.
?And the macro events of 2026 line up shockingly well.
Projected upside level
|
|
|
08.12.25 - 18:15
|
I Found a Pattern in $AI That Shouldn't Exist. 45–46 (late 2026) (TradingView)
|
|
|
I've been studying NYSE:AI 's entire 2025 price cycle, and what I found is pretty interesting.
The entire downtrend wasn't random, it behaved like a damped harmonic oscillator.
First drop: –28
Second drop: –15
Third drop: –7
Each decline was almost exactly 50% of the previous one.
Same thing on the rallies:
First up-leg: +13
Second: +5.4
That's a 40% decay ratio.
Time cycles also shrank consistently:
105 days → 32 days → projected 10 days
Classic volatility compression.
So mathematically, the trend was dying.
The system was running out of downward energy
And then it broke the model.
The latest leg up exceeded the expected top
meaning the damping phase is over.
So I mirrored the entire pattern. Literally flipped it upside down
If the downtrend behaved like a decaying oscillator, the reversal should behave like an expanding oscillator.
The geometry lines up.
The timings line up.
The volume shelves line up.
?And the macro events of 2026 line up shockingly well.
Projected upside level
|
|
|
08.12.25 - 18:09
|
I Found a Pattern in $AI That Shouldn't Exist. (TradingView)
|
|
|
I've been studying NYSE:AI 's entire 2025 price cycle, and what I found is pretty interesting.
The entire downtrend wasn't random, it behaved like a damped harmonic oscillator.
First drop: –28
Second drop: –15
Third drop: –7
Each decline was almost exactly 50% of the previous one.
Same thing on the rallies:
First up-leg: +13
Second: +5.4
That's a 40% decay ratio.
Time cycles also shrank consistently:
105 days → 32 days → projected 10 days
Classic volatility compression.
So mathematically, the trend was dying.
The system was running out of downward energy
And then it broke the model.
The latest leg up exceeded the expected top
meaning the damping phase is over.
So I mirrored the entire pattern. Literally flipped it upside down
If the downtrend behaved like a decaying oscillator, the reversal should behave like an expanding oscillator.
The geometry lines up.
The timings line up.
The volume shelves line up.
?And the macro events of 2026 line up shockingly well.
Projected upside level
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04.09.25 - 15:09
|
9/4/25 - $ai - unownable (TradingView)
|
|
|
9/4/25 :: VROCKSTAR :: NYSE:AI
unownable
- while cash balance high
- everything in reverse and unclear how this gets turned around
- super complicated to see when this reverses... 2026 at some pt?
- mkt hard enough to own "great" companies today (that are smaller), so forget trying to own stuff in crisis mode
- someone remind me when this goes to $10 and i'd look again
- might be nice for trading volatility, but can't see any real money buying this dip and instead looking to blow out of position before YE and then add tax loss selling... and oof.
V
|
|
|
09.08.25 - 08:27
|
SHORT | AI (TradingView)
|
|
|
NYSE:AI
Weekly Chart Analysis
A clear Head & Shoulders pattern has formed with neckline support around the $18.80–$18.20 zone. Price failed to hold above the 50 & 200 EMA, breaking structure from Lower Highs. Volume confirms distribution. A decisive break below neckline could open downside targets toward $16.80 and potentially lower, aligning with the descending trendline projection
|
|
|
|
|
30.07.25 - 04:51
|
$AI they sleep, i eat. Quiet danger.. (TradingView)
|
|
|
Hello,
Name has been on my watch for a week or so now, finally just sitting back and getting to a multi analytical chart.
To begin: Yes, I see the head and shoulders pattern forming, scary, I know. Aside from that just zoom out, this name has traded in this range for 1,200 days... the range of $20 to $30 with some bumps in the $40's and low $20's with taps in the teens. This name is quiet, not a loud player like other AI tickers. Something smells fun here. I'm going to be gearing in some $40 calls for 2026. I may risk 20% of my port here. I feel confident in this one, I do. The name is holding good support in the low $20 range and there are a lot more green candles than red. I know other names are getting more attractive like BBAI, you still have SMCI, CRWV, NVDA and so forth, which is fine, means nothing. This was a meme name type of stock about a year ago. I believe this will go on a run towards $50. If you have patience, $50 calls for 2027 would be appropriate and at a fair price for a swing and a possi
|
|
|
|
|
|